coy wire, cnn 10 anchor: what's up, sunshine.
美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）主持人Coi Wyle：親愛的觀眾，大家好。
it's time to shine.
讓我們開始閃耀吧。
i'm coy wire.
我是Coy Wyle。
pun to be here with you this thursday, happy friday eve.
很高興與您共度星期四，並祝您星期五前夕快樂。
we are at super bowl radio row where more than 6,000 credential media for more than 20 countries are here to report on the first ever super bowl in las vegas, nevada.
我們現在在超級碗轉播區，來自 20 多個國家的 6,000 多名**聚集在一起，報道在內華達州拉斯維加斯舉行的第一屆超級碗。
now, speaking of nevada, this state, as well as the virgin islands will be holding republican party caucuses today.
說到內華達州，該州和維京群島今天將舉行共和黨核心小組會議。
now, there was a nevada gop primary on tuesday, but republicans h**e chosen to award their delegates through today's caucuses.
內華達州已經在周二舉行了共和黨初選，但共和黨人選擇通過今天的核心小組會議來決定他們的代表。
former president donald trump is currently in the lead for his party's nomination.
前唐納德·川普目前正在領導黨的提名。
and his biggest fight may not be on the campaign trail during the republican primaries, but in the courtroom.
他最大的挑戰可能不是在共和黨初選期間競選，而是在法庭上。
earlier this week, a federal appeals court said that trump is not immune from prosecution for federal election subversion charges.
本週早些時候，聯邦上訴法院表示，川普不能免於因顛覆聯邦選舉的指控而受到起訴。
this ruling is a blow to trump's argument that his actions in 2020 were part of his official duties as president and are therefore protected from criminal trials.
該裁決對川普的宣告造成了打擊，他認為他在 2020 年的行為是他作為**的官方職責的一部分，因此受到刑事審判的保護。
trump faces four counts in the election subversion case, which includes conspiring to defraud the united states and to obstruct an official proceeding.
川普在顛覆選舉案中面臨四項指控，包括串謀欺詐美國和妨礙官方程式。
he has pleaded not guilty.
他不認罪。
now, the timing of this trial will be up to the supreme court.
現在，審判的時間將由最高法院決定。
trump's defense team hopes to delay his criminal cases until after the 2024 election.
川普的辯護團隊希望將他的刑事案件推遲到2024年之後**。
now, speaking of the supreme court, that leads us to another legal fight for trump.
現在，說到最高法院，讓我們想想另一場關於川普的法律鬥爭。
today, the nation's highest court will hear oral arguments on whether states can remove trump from election ballots.
今天，美國最高法院將就各州是否可以將川普從選舉選票中移除進行口頭辯論。
last year colorado's state supreme court ruled trump is constitutionally ineligible to run in 2024, because of the 14th amendment's ban on insurrectionists holding office covers his conduct on january 6th, 2021.
去年，科羅拉多州最高法院裁定，川普在憲法上沒有資格參加2024年的競選**，因為第14修正案禁止叛亂分子擔任公職，其中包括他在2021年1月6日的行為。
and they aren't the only state looking to remove the former president from election ballots.
他們並不是唯一乙個試圖從選舉選票中刪除前**的州。
the last time the supreme court was at the center of a presidential election battle was back in 2000, where their ruling delivered the presidency to republican george w. bush by halting a florida vote recount.
最高法院上一次成為選舉的中心是在2000年，當時他們的裁決阻止了佛羅里達州的重新計票，佛羅里達州選出了共和黨人喬治·W·布希。
there's a lot to unpack with these cases, but let's turn now to our legal analyst,elie honig, who looks at what the supreme court justices will and won't be deciding in the trump ballot eligibility case.
裡面還有很多話要說，現在讓我們來看看我們的法律分析師埃利·霍尼格（Elie Hornig），他專注於最高法院大法官在川普資格案中將做出和不會做出的決定。
elie honig, cnn senior legal analyst: don't expect the supreme court to decide whether donald trump did or did not engage in insurrection.
法律分析家Eli Honig：不要指望最高法院會決定唐納德·川普是否參與了叛亂。
i'll explain why in a moment.
我會馬上解釋原因。
you probably know by now that the 14th amendment says that anyone who is engaged in insurrection cannot hold office.
正如你現在可能知道的那樣，第十四修正案規定，任何參與叛亂的人都不能擔任公職。
and that colorado has disqualified donald trump from its ballot under that provision.
根據該條款，科羅拉多州取消了唐納德·川普的投票資格。
now, here's what the supreme court will be asking about.
現在，這就是最高法院要問的問題。
donald trump's team will argue that while the 14th amendment does specify certain offices, senators, representatives, and others, it actually says nothing specifically about the president.
唐納德·川普的團隊會爭辯說，雖然第14修正案確實規定了某些職位，參議員，眾議員和其他人，但它實際上並沒有特別提到**。
colorado is going to counter that.
科羅拉多州將進行反擊。
yes, but the 14th amendment actually does say it applies to officers of the united states.
是的，但第十四修正案確實說它適用於美國**（含**）。
this will be a close call.
這將是乙個嚴峻的時刻。
it'll come down to how the justices choose to interpret those words in the constitution.
這將取決於法官如何選擇解釋憲法中的這些詞語。
watch for trump's team to argue that it's up to congress and not the individual states to decide whether and how to apply the 14th amendment.
川普的團隊會說，由國會而不是各州來決定是否以及如何適用第14修正案。
colorado will argue that the states h**e the power to enforce the 14th amendment.
科羅拉多州將爭辯說，各州有權執行第 14 條修正案。
the problem here is if the supreme court allows the states to make these decisions on their own, we could end up in a situation where major party candidates are kicked off the ballot in some states, but not others.
這裡的問題是，如果最高法院允許各州自行做出這些決定，最終可能會出現一些州的主要政黨候選人被淘汰，而其他州仍然有權參選的情況。
so how about the big question?
那麼最重要的問題呢？
did donald trump engage in insurrection?
唐納德·川普造反了嗎？
of course, colorado claims he did.
當然，科羅拉多州聲稱他反叛了。
and donald trump says he did not.
唐納德·川普說他沒有。
but don't expect the justices to go too deep into this question.
但不要指望法官會深入到問題的本質。
first, that's just not what the supreme court does.
首先，這不是最高法院的作用。
they don't hold trials and they don't find facts.
他們不評判，他們不尋找事實。
second, they don't need to decide this question.
其次，他們不需要決定問題。
the supreme court always likes to rule as narrowly as possible.
最高法院一向傾向於在盡可能狹隘的意義上作出裁決。
and the supreme court tries to base its rulings on procedural and constitutional issues like the ones we just talked about.
正如我們剛才談到的那樣，最高法院試圖將其裁決建立在程式和憲法問題上。
however this case comes out, we will see history in the **
無論此案的結果如何，我們都將見證歷史的創造。
now, i got to go.
現在，我得走了。
wire: now, as this election season heats up, there is another complicated issue that could affect political outcomes.
懷爾：現在，隨著這個選舉季節的公升溫，有乙個複雜的問題可能會影響政治結果。
ai generated deepfakes, a deepfake refers to audio or video that has been created using artificial intelligence.
人工智慧生成的深度偽造，指的是使用人工智慧製作的音訊或**。
and these deepfakes can look and sound realistic.
這些深度偽造看起來和聽起來都很逼真。
there are tools that can detect these hoaxes, but we're still playing catch up, if you will.
有一些工具可以檢測到這些**，但我們仍在努力看穿它們。
cnn's donie o'sullivan, investigates one mayoral election that may h**e been affected by the misuse of this technology.
美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）的多尼·奧沙利文（Doni O'Sullivan）調查了可能受到濫用該技術影響的市長選舉。
donie o'sullivan, cnn correspondent: when democrat paul vallas ran in a contentious race last year for chicago mayor, he faced an unprecedented attack, a deepfake creative using artificial intelligence.
美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）的多尼·奧沙利文（Doni O'Sullivan）：去年，當民主黨人保羅·瓦拉斯（Paul Vallas）參加一場激烈的芝加哥市長競選時，他面臨著前所未有的攻擊，即使用人工智慧的深度偽造音訊。
ai-generated fake audio: we need to stop defunding the police and start refunding them.
人工智慧生成的假音訊：我們需要停止削減警察的資金，並重新開始為他們提供資金。
o'sullivan: so you've never actually heard the --paul vallas, former chicago mayoral candidate: no, no.
奧沙利文：所以你從來沒有真正聽過——前芝加哥市長候選人保羅·沃拉斯：不，不。
o'sullivan: oh, wow.
奧沙利文：哦，哇。
well i'm going to play it for you.
讓我告訴你。
vallas: no, no, no, no, no.
奧沙利文：不，不。
you don't need to.
不一定。 it's only --only aggr**ate me.
這只會讓我生氣。
o'sullivan: ok.
奧沙利文：好的。
this deepfake audio view played into this idea that, you know, you weren't democrat enough for the democratic party.
這種深度偽造的音訊讓我們覺得你對民主黨來說還不夠民主。
that you're too pro-police, which was a line of attack against you.
你太親愛的了，這是對你的攻擊。
vallas: yeah. well, clearly, you know, look, chicago is a very, very, very, very blue city.
奧沙利文：是的，很明顯，芝加哥是乙個民主黨主導的城市。
and they were trying to portray me as some --some far hard right conservative republican, being able to throw mud against the wall like that, put you in a position where you h**e to deny it or damage has still been done.
他們試圖把我描繪成乙個極右翼的保守派共和黨人，他可以像那樣向牆上扔泥巴，把你放在乙個你無法否認的位置，或者做既成事實。
and there is some damage that's not reparable.
有些損害是無法彌補的。
it's clear based on the result tonight that the city is deeply divided.
從今晚的選舉結果可以清楚地看出，該市的兩黨存在嚴重分歧。
o'sullivan: vallas lost the election by four points.
奧沙利文：瓦拉斯以4%的優勢輸掉了選舉。
he says he doesn't know the full effect the deepfake had on the race.
他說，他不知道深度偽造對競選活動的全部影響。
the account that shared the deepfake of you was called chicago lake front news.
分享您的深度偽造新聞的帳戶稱為芝加哥湖畔新聞。
vallas: yeah.
瓦拉斯：是的。
o'sullivan: doesn't exist.
奧沙利文：它不存在。
vallas: yeah, it doesn't exist. yeah.
瓦拉斯：是的，現實中沒有這樣的賬戶。
o'sullivan: so it was very clearly set up for the purpose to character assassinate you.
奧沙利文：所以這顯然是為了詆毀你。
vallas: yeah.
瓦拉斯：是的。
o'sullivan: and this was a close race?
奧沙利文：這是一場勢均力敵的比賽嗎？
vallas: and this was a really close race.
瓦拉斯：這是一場勢均力敵的比賽。
o'sullivan: digital forensics expert hany farid says ai deepfakes are no longer a hypothetical problem, but an actual threat to elections.
奧沙利文：數字取證專家哈尼·法里德（Hani Farid）表示，人工智慧深度偽造不再是乙個假設的問題，而是對選舉的實際威脅。
ai-generated fake audio: 17 or 18 civilians in their career and nobody would bat an eye.
人工智慧產生的假音訊：17 或 18 名平民在他們的職業生涯中，沒有人感興趣。
hany farid, digital forensics expert, university of california, berkeley: so i make a lot of fakes because i'm in the business of detecting them.
加州大學伯克利分校數字取證專家哈尼·法里德（Hani Farid）：所以我做了很多偽造品，因為我從事的是檢測偽造品的工作。
and i can do that whole thing in about five minutes.
我可以在五分鐘內完成整個過程。
o'sullivan: yeah.
奧沙利文：嗯。
farid: almost anybody.
法里德：幾乎每個人都能做到。
here's why i think audio alone is in some ways a bigger threat.
這就是為什麼我認為音訊本身在某種程度上是乙個更大的威脅。
the most compelling deepfakes that i've seen are these so- called hot mic deepfakes.
我見過的最引人注目的深度偽造是這些所謂的熱麥克風假聲。
you don't see their mouth moving.
你看不到他們的嘴巴在動。
you don't see anything, but you hear the voice and it's visceral.
你什麼也看不見，但你可以聽到發自內心的聲音。
and it sounds like you're your e**esdropping on them.
聽起來你在偷聽他們。
and i think that --that those are really powerful.
我認為這些非常強大。
o'sullivan: a cnn analysis shows that u.s. isn't prepared to respond effectively.
奧沙利文：美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）的一項分析顯示，美國還沒有準備好做出有效回應。
we ask election officials in all 50 states, how they're preparing for deepfakes, 33 responded, but less than half of those cited specific actions to handle ai threats.
我們詢問了所有 50 個州選舉**，他們是如何為深度偽造做準備的，有 33 人做出了回應，但其中不到一半的人提到了應對人工智慧威脅的具體行動。
farid: i don't think we're ready.
法里德：我認為我們還沒有準備好。
i mean, we are still struggling with the last 10 years of the nonsense that has been social media as in the lives and the conspiracies that are propagated.
我的意思是，我們仍在與社會在過去 10 年的生活和傳播陰謀中產生的胡言亂語作鬥爭。
it's --it's hard to look at that and say, well, the injection of jet fuel into that is not going to h**e any impact.
很難看到這些，然後說，新增這些燃料不會有任何影響。
of course it will.
他們當然有效。
o'sullivan: they talk to a lot of people on the left, liberals.
奧沙利文：他們和很多左派、自由主義者交談。
and there is at times a bit of smugness there, which says, well, it's the trump supporters who fall for online misinformation.
有時，川普的支持者會因為相信網上的錯誤資訊而感到有些自滿。
vallas: right, right.
瓦拉斯：是的。
o'sullivan: not us.
奧沙利文：不是我們。
vallas: yeah.
瓦拉斯：是的。
o'sullivan: we're also susceptible to this, are we?
奧沙利文：我們也很脆弱，不是嗎？
vallas: yeah.
瓦拉斯：是的。
we're also susceptible to it and we all do it.
我們也很脆弱，我們都很脆弱。
when i say we all do it, i'm saying within every group, there are people who will do it.
當我說我們都這樣做時，我的意思是在每個群體中，都有人這樣做。
there are people who will cross that line.
有些人會越過這條線。
o'sullivan: a lot of americans might think, oh, the risk of ai and all this sort of stuff.
奧沙利文：很多美國人可能會想，哦，人工智慧和所有這些東西的風險。
it's in the future.
一切都在未來。 it's being overblown.
這一切都被誇大了。
vallas: yeah. mean the future is now, the future is here.
瓦拉斯：未來就在這裡。
i won't be the first and i won't be the last, you know.
我不會是第乙個，也不會是最後乙個。
wire: ten second trivia.
Wyle：十秒鐘的瑣事。
what year was the oldest surviving photograph taken?
現存最年長的**是哪一年拍攝的？
1861, 1839, 1826 or 1818?
1861年、1839年、1826年還是1818年？
if you said 1826, put your hands up.
如果你說是1826年，請舉手。
according to how stuff works, it took joseph nicephore niepce eight hours to produce the photo using his primitive camera.
根據 HowstuffWorks** 的說法，Joseph Nisver Nepps 花了 8 個小時才用他的原始相機**製作這個。
today's story getting a 10 out of 10. can you imagine how life will change a thousand years from now?
有了今天最後一分鐘的故事，你能想象一千年後生活會有什麼變化嗎？
while a philosopher from the university of arizona created a camera to record the past for future generations and to prompt all of us to think about how we can influence the future a thousand years away.
亞利桑那大學（University of Arizona）的一位哲學家發明了一種相機，為子孫後代記錄過去，並促使我們所有人思考如何影響幾千年後的未來。
here's jeremy roth with more.
傑里公尺·羅斯（Jeremy Ross）帶來了詳細的報道。
jeremy roth, cnn reporter: take a look at a camera that will be taking one single picture for 1000 years.
美國有線電視新聞網（CNN）主持人傑里公尺·羅斯（Jeremy Ross）：看看這台相機，它可以拍到1000年前的**。
it's called the millennium camera and is an ambitious project from an experimental philosopher at the university of arizona.
它被稱為千禧相機，是亞利桑那大學一位實驗哲學家的乙個雄心勃勃的專案。
the special camera set up overlooking a tucson area desert was designed to take one extremely long exposure of the vista over the next 10 centuries.
在圖森地區的沙漠上空架設了一台特殊的相機，以便在接下來的 10 個世紀內提供極長的**遠景。
the idea is not only to one day show how the environment changed over time, but also to inspire discussions now about actions that can be taken to shape its future.
這個想法不僅是為了展示環境如何隨著時間的推移而變化，而且還激勵人們現在談論如何採取行動來塑造未來。
but as far as the finished photo is concerned, it won't be ready to view until the year 3023. so check back then, i guess.
但就成品**而言，要到3023年才能看到，所以到時候就讓我們看看吧，我想。
wire: all right.
Wyle：好的。
question for all of you.
問每個人乙個問題。
why did the camera stop dreaming about a career in photography?
為什麼相機不再夢想從事攝影事業？
it couldn't remain focused.
因為它無法保持專注（無法專注）。
all right, superstars.
好吧，超級巨星。
that's it for today's show.
今天的節目到此結束。
but it's time for some shout outs. st. croix central high school located on this island of st. croix in the u.s. virgin islands, rise up.
是時候大聲打個招呼了。 聖克羅伊中心高中，位於美屬維京群島的聖克羅伊島，崛起。
we see you.
我們看到你。
next up, coronado high school in henderson, nevada.
接下來是內華達州亨德森的科羅納多高中。
cougars, keep on being awesome.
美洲獅，請繼續努力。
for all you sports fans out there, i'm interviewing the goat, tom brady tomorrow.
體育迷們，明天我要採訪湯姆·布雷迪（Tom Brady）的《山羊》（The Goat）。
so send your questions to the comment section of my most recent post @coywire on social.
因此，將您的問題發布到我最近的帖子@coywire的評論部分。
and i'm going to pick one winner from a viewer to ask tom, and i'm going to say your name and school when i ask him.
我要從觀眾中選出最好的問題問湯姆，當我問他時，我會說出你的名字和學校。
all right, we'll see you tomorrow, lovely people.
好吧，我們明天見，親愛的朋友們。
i'm coy wire and we are cnn 10.
我是 Coy Wyer，我們是 CNN 10。